SciCom – What Are Society Journals?



What's a Society Journal?

Hi Reader, let’s talk about something that has been essential to the development of the scientific system.

They published the first scientific journal ever (despite it being far different from what we call a journal today).

I am sure many scientists have even published in “them” without realizing it - I am referring to Society Journals.

I bring this up because they might represent one of the best antidotes to predatory publishing and the larger issue of publication pressure.


Journal and Publisher

Society journals are journals that are run by a scientific organization.

What makes them special is that, in contrast to other journals, they are not controlled by companies with a commercial purpose - but by non-profit organizations made up of (senior) scientists.

However, to be precise, we need to differentiate between journals and publishers.

While the journals are run by scientific organizations, the journal issues themselves are often (not always) published by larger publishers.

This means that scientists from the society do the editorial work, whereas publishers provide, for example, the technology and infrastructure to securely host publications on the internet.

This is mutually beneficial because scientists can focus on the science, while publishers can expand their portfolios with these journals.

Why You Should Know About Them

What makes societies so valuable is the deep involvement of practicing scientists in their leadership.

That means there are two main advantages, the first being primarily scientific.

If you look at the IUBMB journals that I take as a common example, they have practicing scientists as editors-in-chief.

They are better able to identify with the challenges faced by scientists submitting manuscripts.

Especially in smaller journals, they are very hands-on, meaning that due to their deeper understanding of how the scientific process works, they are, for instance, better able to assess whether additional experiments are truly necessary.

That also means that rebuttals can often be more reasonable and constructive.

The Second Benefit: Prioritization

Beyond benefits for yourself, society journals play a larger role in the ecosystem. It's their prioritization of rigor that might safeguard science.

The key point is that society journals tend to have fewer commercial priorities and stronger scientific ones when it comes to publishing.

Since the entire journal is run by scientists, it is more likely that peer review is conducted properly - and not, for example, via AI or shortcuts.

Moreover, the profits they generate are reinvested into the scientific community.

In other words, if you publish with a commercial publisher like MDPI or Nature, your money essentially goes to shareholders - people for whom publishing is an investment.

In contrast, with a society journal, the profit is used to fund conferences, events, scholarships, and workshops.

You will struggle to find a society journal with excessively high APCs. This is because their profits go back to scientists and their students.

A Look Back and Ahead

Historically, society journals played a major role in developing the scientific system.

Decades ago, they were among the most prestigious journals. In other words, before journals like Nature became dominant, society journals were the ones receiving recognition and shaping scientific discourse.

They acted as hubs for developing scientists and sharing knowledge across the world.

However, with the rapid growth of the scientific system and the advent of the internet, society journals have, to some extent, lost ground.

This is especially noticeable in terms of marketing (and thus visibility) when compared to commercial publishers.

A focus on rigor and scientific standards also meant less investment in email campaigns, author support in copywriting, corporate design, internal operational speed, or the adoption of innovative publishing practices.

It may also contribute that it is not always immediately obvious which journals are society journals...

From my own experience, I would conceptualize them as being able to target a relevant audience without people (from other fields) necessarily knowing that they exist.

A Concluding Remark

Even if society journals do not always have the highest impact factors, experienced scientists who are deeply involved in the system often recognize their value.

This is especially important when they are serving on funding panels or hiring committees that value rigor in their applicants’ work.

Publishing in a society journal can also be a great way to become part of a community, enabling you to network and communicate science internally.

This is not to say that a society journal is always the best choice, but it is certainly an option that should be seriously considered.

How We Feel Today

Edited by Patrick Penndorf
Connection@ReAdvance.com
Lutherstraße 159, 07743, Jena, Thuringia, Germany
Data Protection & Impressum
Unsubscribe · Preferences

A Sign For Science

Sharing how we can communicate our science effectively, whether in posters, papers or on social media!

Read more from A Sign For Science

What's the Right Journal? Hi Reader, where do you normally publish your papers? But why exactly there? It remains one of the most important decisions for your career. If you’re unsure where to publish or if you’re considering switching journals, how do you find a good fit? Here is a pragmatic 7-step framework that should help you make a decision: Step 0 – Build an Initial List First, create a list of potential journals. While several will be top of mind, consider including those that you...

What Makes a Journal? Hi Reader, how many active, peer-reviewed academic journals exist today? There are 40,000! And are you interested in how many papers they publish every day? So, how can you know which journal to publish in? Today, we will discuss five key features of journals to help you differentiate them: What Differentiates Journals With so many journals available, it is easy to think that they differ only by name or impact factor. Click to enlarge. Please take these numbers with a...

Discussing Publication Metrics Hi Reader, I am sure you are aware of the rising pressure to publish papers. An inappropriate use of metrics used to assess publishing success might contribute to a misguided focus within the scientific community. Let’s discuss some important nuances of the metrics we introduced last time to help you develop your own perspective. Let's get started because there are many angles we have to cover: Do Publication Metrics Make Sense? There is no final answer to that...